New Delhi: Restraining coercive motion on a part of the Andhra Pradesh authorities in opposition to two Telugu information channels, the Supreme Courtroom on Monday mentioned “it’s time we outline the boundaries of sedition”.
Justice DY Chandrachud of the apex courtroom noticed “the Andhra Pradesh authorities’s act of submitting sedition instances in opposition to the channels is muffling channels”, including it’s time the courtroom defines sedition”.
The apex courtroom’s remark got here as the 2 channels have been charged in an FIR with sedition allegedly for airing the feedback of YSR Congress insurgent MP Kanumuri Raghurama Krishnam Raju, who had lashed out on the state authorities over its dealing with of the Covid pandemic.
READ: ‘Change Policies’: SC Grills Centre On Vaccination Drive, Dual Pricing & Inaccessibility In Rural India
TV 5 and ABN Andhra Jyoti moved the apex courtroom stating the state authorities had violated a latest courtroom order that restrained the governments from punishing residents for flagging Covid-19 associated grievances.
The apex courtroom bench additionally comprising Justice L. Nageswara Rao and Justice S. Ravindra Bhat sought the Andhra Pradesh authorities’s response inside 4 weeks on the pleas of the 2 channels.
Expressing a prima facie view that FIRs are an try to “muzzle media freedom”, the apex courtroom additionally categorically acknowledged that there shall be no coercive motion in opposition to the staff or the staffers of the 2 information channels.
Source link
